Google
Web The Cat's Dream

Wednesday, August 31, 2005

Water

STOCKHOLM, Aug 29 (IPS) - The Middle East, one of the world's perennial war zones, has traditionally been blessed with a surfeit of oil and cursed by a scarcity of water.

The irony, says one Arab diplomat half-jokingly, is that whenever energy-rich Gulf states dig for water, they invariably strike oil.

The longstanding speculation among some political experts is that the world's future wars will be fought over water, not oil.

Asked whether she subscribes to this view, Sunita Narain, the winner of the 2005 Stockholm Water Prize, said: "Water wars are not invevitable. It lies in our hands -- and in our minds."

Read "Are Water Wars a Fantasy, or a Future Reality?" by Thalif Deen on IPS

Tuesday, August 30, 2005

Poverty in the USA

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The nation's poverty rate rose to 12.7 percent of the population last year, the fourth consecutive annual increase, the Census Bureau said Tuesday.

The percentage of people without health insurance did not change.

Overall, there were 37 million people living in poverty, up 1.1 million people from 2003.

Read "U.S. Poverty Rate Rises to 12.7 Percent" By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS on The New York Times

Saturday, August 27, 2005

Fisk: if "we" had not invaded Iraq...

For it is a fact, is it not, that if "we" had not invaded Iraq in 2003, those 43 Iraqis would not have been pulverised by those three bombs last week. And it is surely a fact that, had we not invaded Iraq, the 7 July bombs would not have gone off (and I am ignoring Lord Blair's piffle about "evil ideologies"). In which case the Pope would not last week have been lecturing German Muslims on the evils of "terrorism".

Read "How easily we have come to take the bombs and the deaths in Iraq for granted" by Robert Fisk on Global Echo

Palestinians' survival

Israel and its supporters can say "Jewish state" or "threat to Israel's existence" or "anti-Semitic" and be understood and empathized with instantly. The established framework is that the conflict is all about Israel's survival; we have all been led to believe for half a century that the Arabs want to destroy Israel as a state and kill Jews, and so the "frame" accepts that Israel -- with massive U.S. aid, of course -- must defend itself at all costs, that Israel's security is all-important. No further explanation is needed. In reality, the issue is not Israel's survival, which is not in danger, but the Palestinians' survival and the threat to the Palestinians' existence as a people and a nation. But in order to put this point across, Palestinians must, as a Palestinian woman once put it, "go into books and books of history just to explain why falafel is not an Israeli dish."

Read "Can Palestine be Put Back Into the Equation?" By KATHLEEN CHRISTISON on CounterPunch

Friday, August 26, 2005

Howard Zinn on Gino Strada

On August 3, Human Rights Watch announced that the Bush Administration “appears poised to resume the production of anti-personnel mines” for the first time since 1997. It noted that “the Pentagon has requested a total of $1.3 billion” for a new type of land mine. This registered with me because I had just read Dr. Gino Strada’s Green Parrots: A War Surgeon’s Diary. The book tells of his fifteen years performing surgery in Afghanistan, Iraq, Bosnia, Somalia, Eritrea, Cambodia, and other places, on victims of land mines and other products of our technological expertise. The “green parrots” are land mines with tiny wings, which look like toys to children, who then pick them up—with horrible consequences.

Read "A Surgeon’s Touch" By Howard Zinn on The Progressive

Monday, August 22, 2005

Mustafa Barghouthi

Today we and all who have stood with us in our struggle for peace and freedom celebrate the removal of illegal settlements from Gaza. But we must remain vigilant in order to harness the momentum of this process and take it to its logical conclusion - a sovereign Palestinian state in the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem.

Read "Make sure 'Gaza first' is not 'Gaza last'" by Mustafa Barghouthi on ZNet

“What is it going to take to win?”

... in the United States, while the growth of anti-war sentiment is apparent, much of the criticism—especially what’s spotlighted in news media—is based on distress that American casualties are continuing without any semblance of victory. In effect, many commentators see the problem as a grievous failure to kill enough of the bad guys in Iraq and sufficiently intimidate the rest.

For example, bypassing the euphemisms preferred by many liberal pundits, George Will wrote in a Washington Post column on April 7, 2004, that “every door American troops crash through, every civilian bystander shot—there will be many—will make matters worse, for a while. Nevertheless, the first task of the occupation remains the first task of government: to establish a monopoly on violence.”

A lot of what sounds like opposition to the war is more like opposition to losing the war. Consider how Philadelphia Inquirer columnist Trudy Rubin concluded a piece on Sunday that disparaged Bush and his war policies. The column included eloquent, heartrending words from the mother of a Marine Corps Reserve member who died in Iraq early this year. And yet, the last quote from her was: “Tell us what it is going to take to win, Mr. Bush.” In a tag line, the columnist described it as a question “we all need an answer to.”

But some questions are based on assumptions that should be rejected—and “What is it going to take to win?” is one of them. In Iraq, the U.S. occupation force can’t “win.” More importantly, it has no legitimate right to try.

Read "Don't Give Bush An Exit Strategy" by Norman Solomon on TomPaine.com

Colonialism

Early this year, Gordon Brown told journalists in Mozambique that Britain should stop apologising for colonialism. The truth is, though, that Britain has never even faced up to the dark side of its imperial history, let alone begun to apologise.

Read "The wealth of the west was built on Africa's exploitation" by Richard Drayton on The Guardian

London Police: killing and lying

I have always believed those who break the law should be punished. Some people have broken the law. They have killed Jean and told lies. They must face justice. For the sake of my family, for the people of London. In Jean's name, I say those responsible should resign. Ian Blair should resign."

Alessandro Pereira: 'Why did Ian Blair say my cousin was a terrorist?' The statement from Alessandro Pereira, the cousin of Jean Charles de Menezes, The Independent

Democracy and Middle East

"What is this ’evil ideology’ that Blair keeps talking about?" an Iraqi friend asked me this week. "What will be your next invention? When will you wake up?" I couldn’t put it better myself.

Read "What Does Democracy Really Mean In The Middle East? Whatever The West Decides" by Robert Fisk on GlobalEcho

Can Cindy Sheehan End the War?

You can tell in five-minutes channel surfing how Cindy Sheehan frightens the pro-war crowd. One bereaved mom from Vacaville, camped outside Bush's home in Crawford, reproaching the vacationing President for sending her son to a pointless death in Iraq has got the hellhounds of the right barking in venomous unison. (...) But Sheehan is castigated in the press, by mainstream liberals as well as mad-dog rightists, for not leaving any wriggle-room on this central point. She says, Bring the troops home right now.

Read "Can Cindy Sheehan End the War?" By ALEXANDER COCKBURN on CounterPunch

Friday, August 19, 2005

Iran and repression against homosexuality

The latest dismal news about the Islamic Republic of Iran’s campaign of repression against homosexuality comes from the city of Arak, where two homosexual men are scheduled to be executed at the end of the month, probably on August 27( although some sources claim the executions are set for the following day.)

Arak -- some 150 miles southwest of Tehran -- is a city under the strictest possible conservative religious, political, and military rule because it is the site of Iran’s heavy water plant -- heavy water is used in the production of fissionable nuclear material and is crucial to Iran’s attempts to develop a deliverable nuclear weapon. (Cartoon at right courtesy of In These Times). The two condemned men, both 27 -- whose names may be transliterated as Farad Mostar and Ahmed Choka -- were sentenced by an Arak court for sexual assault with homosexual acts, or, in other words, rape. Mostar and Choka, who are said to be intimate friends and business partners in a music store, were accused of having sequestered and sexually violated a 22 year old man.

Read "IRAN'S DEADLY ANTI-GAY CRACKDOWN--WITH TWO MORE EXECUTIONS SCHEDULED, THE PACE OF REPRESSION STEPS UP" by Doug Ireland on DIRELAND

Fascism, yesterday and today

Thomas Friedman is a famous columnist on the New York Times. He has been described as "a guard dog of US foreign policy". Whatever America's warlords have in mind for the rest of humanity, Friedman will bark it. He boasts that "the hidden hand of the market will never work without a hidden fist". He promotes bombing countries and says world war three has begun.

Friedman's latest bark is about free speech, which his country's constitution is said to safeguard. He wants the State Department to draw up a blacklist of those who make "wrong" political statements. He is referring not only to those who advocate violence, but those who believe American actions are the root cause of the current terrorism. The latter group, which he describes as "just one notch less despicable than the terrorists", includes most Americans and Britons, according to the latest polls.

Read "The Rise Of The Democratic Police State" by John Pilger on ZNet

We have examples in history. One doesn't have to go back very far:
“First they came for the Communists, but I was not a Communist so I did not speak out. Then they came for the Socialists and the Trade Unionists, but I was neither, so I did not speak out. Then they came for the Jews, but I was not a Jew so I did not speak out. And when they came for me, there was no one left to speak out for me.” - Martin Niemoeller

Wednesday, August 17, 2005

The Anti - Antiwar Movement

The surge of antiwar voices in U.S. media this month has coincided with new lows in public approval for what pollsters call President Bush’s “handling” of the Iraq war. After more than two years of a military occupation that was supposed to be a breeze after a cakewalk into Baghdad, the war has become a clear PR loser. But an unpopular war can continue for a long time -- and one big reason is that the military-industrial-media complex often finds ways to blunt the effectiveness of its most prominent opponents. Right now, the pro-war propaganda arsenal of the world’s only superpower is drawing a bead on Cindy Sheehan, who now symbolizes the USA’s antiwar grief. She is a moving target, very difficult to hit. But right-wing media sharpshooters are sure to keep trying. The Bush administration’s top officials must be counting the days until the end of the presidential vacation brings to a close the Crawford standoff between Camp Casey and Camp Carnage. But media assaults on Cindy Sheehan are just in early stages.

Blaming Antiwar Messengers
by Norman Solomon, ZNet

Tuesday, August 16, 2005

Gaza: The world's largest prison camp

At the moment Israel talks of improving conditions at the notorious Erez crossing from Gaza into Israel, where thousands of Palestinian cheap labourers are routinely humiliated and crushed in pens for hours before they can get into Israel to work. But in the longer term it seems Israel wants to lock up Gaza and throw away the key. Shaul Mofaz, the Minister of Defence, and Ehud Olmert, the Deputy Prime Minister, have both gone on record this summer as saying that no Palestinian workers will be allowed into Israel from 2008. The wording of the disengagement bill states there are to be no labourers "in the longer term".

Paul McCann (*): The world's largest prison camp
It seems that Israel wants to lock up Gaza and throw away the key
The Independent

(*) The writer was spokesman for the UN's Palestinian refugee agency in Gaza from 2001-2005

Women of the New Iraq

The war on Iraq has not only made the country and world less safe, it has erased the social and political rights of women who were the most liberated in the Middle East.

Women of the New Iraq
By Haifa Zangana, AlterNet

Monday, August 15, 2005

Someone Tell Frank Rich the War Isn't Over

On Sunday, the New York Times published a piece by Frank Rich under the headline "Someone Tell the President the War Is Over." The article was a flurry of well-placed jabs about the Bush administration's lies and miscalculations for the Iraq war. But the essay was also a big straw in liberal wind now blowing toward dangerous conclusions.

Someone Tell Frank Rich the War Isn't Over
By NORMAN SOLOMON, CounterPunch

Cindy Sheehan

CINDY SHEEHAN: Well, I want to know what the noble cause is that Casey -- you know, the supposed noble cause that Casey died for. You know, I don't believe that a war of aggression against a country that was no threat to the United States of America, dying for that is a noble cause. I don't believe sending our children to die for something like that is a noble cause. I would like him to tell me if he thinks it's such a noble cause, does he encourage his own daughters to enlist and go over there and take the place of some soldiers who might want to come home. And then another thing, he always says that we have to honor the sacrifices of the fallen by completing the mission. Well, you know what? I don't want him to use Casey's death to justify his killing anymore. And his press conference yesterday, he said, I have his sympathy. I don't want his sympathy. I want answers

Protest on the Range: Cindy Sheehan Calls for Mass Demos at Bush's Crawford Ranch
Democracy Now! with Amy Goodman



We are here at the Crawford Peace House now. I came here so angry and I have been so encouraged and overwhelmed by the support from all over. I was thinking that there is no reason for us progressive liberals to be angry anymore. We have the power. One mom has shown that ordinary citizens can make a difference. We the people have to hold George Bush accountable. We have to make sure he answers to us. If he doesn't have to answer to Congress, or the media, we will force him to answer to us.

We Have the Power By Cindy Sheehan
Published on Saturday, August 13,2005 by HuffingtonPost.com
Common Dreams

Robert Fisk: Iraq’s new constitution?

Behind ramparts of concrete and barbed wire, the framers of Iraq’s new constitution wrestled yesterday to prevent - or bring about - the federalisation of Iraq while their compatriots in the hot and fetid streets outside showed no interest in their efforts. Today is supposed to be "C" day, according to President Bush and all the others who illegally invaded this country in 2003. However, in " real" Baghdad - where the President and Prime Minister and the constitutional committee never set foot - they ask you about security, about electricity, about water, about when the occupation will end, when the murders will end, when the rapes will end.

A constitution that means nothing to ordinary Iraqis
by Robert Fisk, The Independent

WILLIAM BLUM

From The Anti-Empire Report: Some things you need to know before the world ends August 7, 2005 by William Blum
But prior to September 11 there was already a long list of grievances against American actions, enough to fuel a dozen al Qaedas:

* the shooting down of two Libyan planes in 1981

* the bombardment of Beirut in 1983 and 1984

* the bombing of Libya in 1986

* the bombing and sinking of an Iranian ship in 1987

* the shooting down of an Iranian passenger plane in 1988

* the shooting down of two more Libyan planes in 1989

* the massive bombing of the Iraqi people in 1991

* the continuing bombings and terrible sanctions against Iraq for the next 12 years

* the bombing of Afghanistan and Sudan in 1998

* the habitual support of Israel despite the routine devastation and torture it inflicts upon the Palestinian people

* the habitual condemnation of Palestinian resistance to this

* the large military and hi-tech presence in Islam's holiest land, Saudi Arabia, and elsewhere in the Persian Gulf region

* the long-term support of undemocratic, authoritarian Middle Eastern governments, from the Shah of Iran to the Saudis

Sunday, August 14, 2005

"Iraqi Freedom"

On 14 July, the second grade schoolboy had gone to spend the night with two college friends and - this being a city without electricity in the hottest month of the year - they decided to spend the night sleeping in the front garden. Let his broken 65 year-old father Selim take up the story, for he's the one who still cannot believe his son is dead - or what the Americans told him afterwards. "It was three-thirty in the morning and they were all asleep, Yassin and his friends Fahed and Walid Khaled. There was an American patrol outside and then suddenly, a Bradley armoured vehicle burst through the gate and wall and drove over Yassin. You know how heavy these things are. He died instantly. But the Americans didn't know what they'd done. He was lying crushed under the vehicle for 17 minutes. Um Khaled, his friends' mother, kept shouting in Arabic: "There is a boy under this vehicle."

How can the US ever win, when Iraqi children die like this?
by Robert Fisk

PALESTINE

"The tragedy of the people of Palestine is that their country was ‘given’ by a foreign power to another people for the creation of a new state. The result was that many hundreds of thousands of innocent people were made permanently homeless. With every new conflict their numbers increased. How much longer is the world willing to endure this spectacle of wanton cruelty? It is abundantly clear that the refugees have every right to the homeland from which they were driven, and the denial of this right is at the heart of the continuing conflict. No people anywhere in the world would accept being expelled en masse from their country; how can anyone require the people of Palestine to accept a punishment which nobody else would tolerate? A permanent just settlement of the refugees in their homeland is an essential ingredient of any genuine settlement in the Middle East".

"Message from Bertrand Russell to the International Conference of Parlimentarians in Cairo, February 1970." Reprinted in The New York Times, Feb. 23, 1970.

Liberal Terrorism

The United Kingdom is the cradle of liberalism and, indeed, one of the places in which Western civilization was born. Britons often take pride in the fact that the protection of individual rights and liberties does not even need a Constitution in the UK - such is the strength of liberal culture and values in the British Isles. Moreover, unlike the situation in the US, British society has the reputation of being fairly tolerant and multicultural. But then Scotland Yard executes Juan Carlos de Menezes - a Brazilian immigrant mistakenly assumed to be a terrorist - according to a brand new principle of the police: first murder, then ask. The logic of this principle is impeccable: if a Muslim fundamentalist is ready to become a human bomb and kill himself alongside thousands of people, we might as well kill him before he can trigger the bomb he carries. But, of course, as there is no time to arrest that person so as to check if he is really a terrorist - and not, say, a Brazilian worker on his way to his job - we must be ready to accept some “collateral damage.” (...) Scotland Yard agents did not know whether or nor he was an “irrational” fundamentalist; but the fact that Menezes was not quite white or rich induced them to think that they could overlook his rights for the sake of national security. Juan Carlos carried the burden of the proof, and he had no time to prove that, despite being dark-skinned, foreigner and poor, he was not an “irrational” terrorist. The problem is not just one of reactionary Texans or a traitor New Labor in power. Capitalism (and its ideology, liberalism) are taking away our rights, including the right not to be killed by the state for no reason. In times of a permanent global war, liberal (state) terrorism is here to stay. As a Latin American, there is one thing I can tell you: We should fear state terrorism more than anything a bunch of fundamentalist bombers might do.

Welcome to Liberal Terrorism
By Ezequiel Adamovsky, ZNet

Iraq Occupation: a problem or a crime?

In 1972, after many years of U.S. involvement in Vietnam, the Pentagon Papers whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg wrote: “In that time, I have seen it first as a problem; then as a stalemate; then as a crime.” That aptly describes three key American perspectives now brought to bear on U.S. involvement in Iraq. The moral clarity and political impacts of Cindy Sheehan’s vigil in Crawford are greatly enhanced by a position that she is taking: U.S. troops should not be in Iraq. Sheehan’s position does not only clash directly with President Bush’s policy, which he reiterated on Thursday: “Pulling the troops out would send a terrible signal to the enemy.” Her call for complete withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq also amounts to a firm rejection of the ongoing stance from Howard Dean, the head of the national Democratic Party, who told a Minneapolis audience on April 20: “Now that we’re there, we’re there and we can’t get out.” Loyal supporters of the Bush policy in Iraq may express misgivings, but they have an outlook that views the faraway war as a fixable “problem.” Dean, the Democratic National Committee chair, has opted to stick to a calibrated partisan line of attack that endorses the essence of the war in real time. “The president has created an enormous security problem for the U.S. where none existed before,” Dean said in Minneapolis. “But I hope the president is incredibly successful with his policy now that he’s there.”

Sheehan Bush and Dean
by Norman Solomon, ZNet

Saturday, August 13, 2005

Death Penalty for gays in Iran

As worldwide protests are taking place against the death penalty and criminalization of homosexuality in Iran in the wake of the hanging of two teenage males in the Iranian city of Mashad, new information is coming in from that country casting doubt on the validity of the rape charges the government there used to justify the death sentences. August 11 has been designated as the day for a series of coordinated demonstrations in France, Ireland, the United Kingdom and elsewhere to protest the hangings of Ayaz Marhoni, 18, and Mahmoud Asgari, who was either 16 or 17 according to press reports. On the controversy surrounding official claims that the executed youths had sexually assaulted a 13-year-old boy, Afdhere Jama, editor of Huriyah, an e-zine for Queer Muslims, said his contacts in Iran affirm that the two youths hung in Mashad were lovers.

Iranian Sources Question Rape Charges in Teen Executions
By DOUG IRELAND, Gay City News


By the same author, read also "TWO NEW GAY EXECUTIONS SCHEDULED IN IRAN, SAYS IRANIAN EXILE GROUP"

Siberia is melting

THE world's largest frozen peat bog is melting. An area stretching for a million square kilometres across the permafrost of western Siberia is turning into a mass of shallow lakes as the ground melts, according to Russian researchers just back from the region. The sudden melting of a bog the size of France and Germany combined could unleash billions of tonnes of methane, a potent greenhouse gas, into the atmosphere.

Climate warning as Siberia melts
NewScientist.com news service by Fred Pearce


Read also "Why the Corporate Rich Oppose Environmentalism" By Michael Parenti

Iraq

RAMADI, Iraq (Reuters) - An attack on a U.S. military patrol followed by heavy U.S. gunfire left 15 Iraqis dead and 17 wounded in a town west of Baghdad, residents said on Saturday. Residents of Nasaf, a town just outside Ramadi, west of Baghdad, said a roadside bomb exploded next to a U.S. armoured patrol as it passed near the Ibn al-Jawzi mosque shortly after prayers on Friday. Following the explosion, U.S. troops opened fire, the residents said, shooting toward those emerging from the mosque. Munem Aftan, the director of Ramadi General Hospital, said 15 people were killed, including eight children, and 17 wounded.

15 killed when attacked U.S. patrol returns fire -doctors
REUTERS

MICHAEL PARENTI

In 1876, Marx's collaborator, Frederich Engels, offered a prophetic caveat: "Let us not . . . flatter ourselves overmuch on account of our human conquest over nature. For each such conquest takes its revenge on us. . . . At every step we are reminded that we by no means rule over nature like a conqueror over a foreign people, like someone standing outside of nature--but that we, with flesh, blood, and brain, belong to nature, and exist in its midst. . . ." With its never-ending emphasis on production and profit, and its indifference to environment, transnational corporate capitalism appears determined to stand outside nature. The driving goal of the giant investment firms is to convert natural materials into commodities and commodities into profits, transforming living nature into vast accumulations of dead capital.

Why the Corporate Rich Oppose Environmentalism
By Michael Parenti

TARIQ ALI

In the face of terror attacks Anglo-Saxon politicians mouth the same rhetoric. One sentence in particular--shrouded in layers of untruth--is constantly repeated: 'We shall not permit these attacks to change our way of life.' It is a multi-purpose mantra. The first aim is to convince the public that the terrorists are crazed Muslims who are bombing modernity/democracy/freedom/ 'our values', etc. This is the first lie. The terror attacks, however misguided and criminal, are a result of the Western military presence in the Arab world. If all the foreign troops and bases were withdrawn, the attacks would cease. This is essentially a post-First Gulf war syndrome.

Blair's New Authoritarianism
Terror and Democracy
By TARIQ ALI

Friday, August 12, 2005

Homosexuality, commercial sex trade and occupation in Iraq

A growing number of Iraqi boys are being forced to join the commercial sex trade --many forced to do so by criminal gangs through threats and violence, intimidation, and blackmail in a country where "honor killings" of youths who engage in same-sex relations by their families is encouraged by Sharia law and religious fanaticism; and some out of poverty in a country where official government figures for youth unemployment at 48 % (although the real figure is undoubtedly much higher). All this is confirmed by a new report from the UN Office of Humanitarian Affairs' Integrated Regional Information Network (IRIN). And this goes on as the U.S. occupying force is silent and does nothing about it. One boy whose story was told in the report was "Hassan Feiraz, a 16-year-old boy, [who] has started a desperate new life since being forced into the sex trade in Baghdad, joining a growing number of adolescents soliciting in Iraq under the threat of street gangs or the force of poverty. "Every day I cry at night,” Feiraz said. “I’m a homosexual and was forced to work as a prostitute because one of the people I had sex with took pictures of me in bed and said that, if I didn't work for him, he was going to send the pictures to my family. My life is a disaster today. I could be killed by my family to restore their honour,” he said, explaining that homosexuality was totally unacceptable in Iraq due to religious beliefs.

OCCUPIED IRAQ: BOYS FORCED BY GANGS INTO SEX WORK, U.S. SILENT by Doug Ireland, DIRELAND

HOWARD ZINN

IT has quickly become clear that Iraq is not a liberated country, but an occupied country. We became familiar with that term during the second world war. We talked of German-occupied France, German-occupied Europe. And after the war we spoke of Soviet-occupied Hungary, Czechoslovakia, eastern Europe. It was the Nazis, the Soviets, who occupied countries. The United States liberated them from occupation. Now we are the occupiers. True, we liberated Iraq from Saddam Hussein, but not from us. Just as in 1898 we liberated Cuba from Spain, but not from us. Spanish tyranny was overthrown, but the US established a military base in Cuba, as we are doing in Iraq. US corporations moved into Cuba, just as Bechtel and Halliburton and the oil corporations are moving into Iraq. The US framed and ­imposed, with support from local accomplices, the constitution that would govern Cuba, just as it has drawn up, with help from local ­political groups, a constitution for Iraq. Not a ­liberation. An occupation. (...) But more ominous, perhaps, than the ­occupation of Iraq is the occupation of the US. I wake up in the morning, read the news­­­paper, and feel that we are an occupied country, that some alien group has taken over. Those Mexican workers trying to cross the border, dying in the attempt to evade immigration officials (trying to cross into land taken from Mexico by the US in 1848), are not alien to me. Those 20 million people who are not citizens and therefore, by the Patriot Act, are subject to ­being pulled out of their homes and held indefinitely by the FBI, with no constitutional rights, are not alien to me. But this small group of men who have taken power in Washington (Bush, Richard Cheney, Rumsfeld and the rest of their clique), they are alien to me. I wake up thinking: the US is in the grip of a president who was first elected in November 2000, under questionable circumstances and largely thanks to a Supreme Court decision. He remains, since his re-election last November, a president surrounded by thugs in suits who care nothing about human life abroad or here, who care nothing about freedom abroad or here, who care nothing about what ­happens to the earth, the water, the air, or what kind of world will be inherited by our children and grandchildren. (...) What is our job? To point all this out. Our faith is that human beings only support violence and terror when they have been lied to. And when they learn the truth, as happened in the course of the Vietnam war, they will turn against the government. We have the support of the rest of the world. The US cannot indefin­itely ignore the 10 million people who protested around the world on 15 February 2003. The power of government, whatever weapons it possesses, whatever money it has at its disposal, is fragile. When it loses its legitimacy in the eyes of its people, its days are numbered. We need to engage in whatever actions appeal to us. There is no act too small, no act too bold. The history of social change is the history of millions of actions, small and large, coming ­together at points in history and creating a power that governments cannot suppress.

Occupied Zones by Howard Zinn, ZNet

Monday, August 08, 2005

Land Mines

UNITED NATIONS, Aug 3 (IPS) - The George W. Bush administration may soon resume production of antipersonnel land mines in a move that is at odds with both the international community and previous U.S. policy on the weapons, says a leading human rights organisation. In December of this year, the Pentagon will decide whether or not to begin producing a new type of antipersonnel land mine called a ”Spider”. The first of these mines would then be scheduled to roll out in early 2007. According to Human Rights Watch (HRW), the funds for Spider's production are already earmarked, as the Pentagon has requested 1.3 billion dollars for the mine system, as well as for another mine called the Intelligent Munitions System, which is expected to be fully running by 2008. A new report by the HRW issued Wednesday notes these weapons that kill and maim an estimated 500 people, mostly civilians, each week. The group called on the Bush administration to halt all research and development on all types of these widely-banned weapons. ”With very few exceptions, nearly every nation has endorsed the goal of a global ban on all antipersonnel mines at some point in the future,” the HRW report says. ”Such acts (by the U.S.) would clearly be against the trend of the emerging international consensus against any possession or use of antipersonnel mines.”

After 10-Year Hiatus, Pentagon Eyes New Landmine By Isaac Baker, IPS

Saturday, August 06, 2005

The destruction of Mecca

Historic Mecca, the cradle of Islam, is being buried in an unprecedented onslaught by religious zealots. Almost all of the rich and multi-layered history of the holy city is gone. The Washington-based Gulf Institute estimates that 95 per cent of millennium-old buildings have been demolished in the past two decades. Now the actual birthplace of the Prophet Mohamed is facing the bulldozers, with the connivance of Saudi religious authorities whose hardline interpretation of Islam is compelling them to wipe out their own heritage.

The destruction of Mecca: Saudi hardliners are wiping out their own heritage
By Daniel Howden, The Independent